The Scripturelink Voter's Guide: Informing Catholics how they should Vote In South Africa

Obama continues health assault- calls insurance companies liars, lobbyists profit seekers

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:46:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voter's Guide; c.f. White House (US Presidency; American; Governmental) 17 / 10 | October / 2009 )

Editorial Article by Marc Aupiais

In a press release from the White House Press Secretary, dated 17 October 2009, Barack Obama once again has attacked the opponents to his health reform plan.

Many of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' (USCCB) member Bishops, have raised serious concerns over the health reform's seeming funding for universal abortion. Alarms at special interests allegedly held by those fronting the bill, were also raised: by the refusal of Obama's party to place any provision or amendment in the bill to remove universal coverage of abortion.

Others, opposed to the passing of this bill have raised concerns over care for the elderly, as well as over the inefficiency of similar systems to the proposed US one, which have been implemented in Canada, and in Great Britain. The press release also does not attempt to counter any claims of big government, or socialisism, thrown against this bill, by opposition members and nay sayers. Rather, the free press, and the industry the bill will affect most are attacked directly by Obama, who claims that he is fighting "big business", a claim not redolent of most capitalist leaders.

The long speech makes no mention of abortion, no mention of Great Britain, no mention of Canada, and no mention of the very real concerns opponents of the plan have voiced. Instead, those opposing the plan are linked by a conspiracy Barack Obama creates, with Health Insurance companies, and studies done are dubbed as deceptive. Barack Obama is known for his association with major abortion firm: Planned parenthood, to whom he made promises during his election campaign, as recorded in the media, which are much more direct than those he made to voters.

Here is a short quote of a summary given by the White House Press Secretary, follow the link (the date is a link) below to see the whole speech:

"WEEKLY ADDRESS: President Obama Calls Hails Progress on Health Insurance Reform Despite Defenders of the Status Quo

WASHINGTON – In his weekly address, President Barack Obama praised the progress that has been made on health insurance reform, and spoke out against those who defend the status quo in order to score political points and protect their profits. With reform the closest it has ever been to becoming law, the insurance companies are rolling out deceptive ads, paying for misleading studies, and flooding Capitol Hill with lobbyists. Now, Washington needs to serve the American people, not the special interests."
(White House (US Presidency; American; Governmental) 17 / 10 | October / 2009 )

Obama has also been accused of attempting to act unilaterally, and of strict control of party ranks, editorially, I think this could be the case:

To give a short section of his long speech, and to demonstrate his attack on media, and all opponents to his bill:

"Of course, like clockwork, we’ve seen folks on cable television who know better, waving these industry-funded studies in the air. We’ve seen industry insiders – and their apologists – citing these studies as proof of claims that just aren’t true. They’ll claim that premiums will go up under reform; but they know that the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office found that reforms will lower premiums in a new insurance exchange while offering consumer protections that will limit out-of-pocket costs and prevent discrimination based on pre-existing conditions. They’ll claim that you’ll have to pay more out of pocket; but they know that this is based on a study that willfully ignores whole sections of the bill, including tax credits and cost savings that will greatly benefit middle class families. Even the authors of one of these studies have now admitted publicly that the insurance companies actually asked them to do an incomplete job.

It’s smoke and mirrors. It’s bogus. And it’s all too familiar. Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, "Take one of these, and call us in a decade." Well, not this time. The fact is, the insurance industry is making this last-ditch effort to stop reform even as costs continue to rise and our health care dollars continue to be poured into their profits, bonuses, and administrative costs that do nothing to make us healthy – that often actually go toward figuring out how to avoid covering people. And they’re earning these profits and bonuses while enjoying a privileged exception from our anti-trust laws, a matter that Congress is rightfully reviewing.

Now, I welcome a good debate. I welcome the chance to defend our proposals and to test our ideas in the fires of this democracy. But what I will not abide are those who would bend the truth – or break it – to score political points and stop our progress as a country. And what we all must oppose are the same old cynical Washington games that have been played for decades even as our problems have grown and our challenges have mounted."
(White House (US Presidency; American; Governmental) 17 / 10 | October / 2009 )

As one might have noted, the concerns of the opposition, are not really laid out, and one unnamed study is claimed to be fraudulent, without more information. Much of the opposition, is based on fears involving service, not simply costs, value, not simply price. It is usual for government to consult with industries when they are affected by a law, however, this US administration, has once again bypassed this practice. It is not a good sign either, when a government determines to attack the credibility of those reporting on it.

Share this page on facebook

Reply to us on twitter

As an internationally collaborative: initiative to provide a more transparent, accurate view of the world: This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine (quotations, or confers in this service/initiative, are provided to give perspective independently, or reference some external sources: and do not imply collaboration, or any kind of affiliation, or co-operation with other services, or initiatives, which are quoted or noted in articles)

Check the accuracy, and perspectives of our contents via the above listed search engine: against other "Catholic" services

Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Discuss our stories:
at our sub-forum on Catholic Answer Forums :

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, it is important for the growth of our service to know your views, and we hope you will leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (editor: marcaup@gmail.com)!

Or become a fan on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

South Africa: Official Opposition (DA) responds to shelving of Judge Hlope impropiety investigation (Judge Hlope:a ruling party ally- accused of attem

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:21:00 +0000

(Also appeared at : South African Catholic 31 / 08 | August / 2009; Kyk na hierdie artikel in Afrikaans; Voir en français)

Notation by Marc Aupiais

The Democratic Alliance, the Official Opposition party in the Republic of South Africa, has slated a choice by a divided JSC (Judicial Service [not "Services"] Commission) to drop investigations as to whether or not Judge Hlope, who as Judge President of the Western Cape High Court, was accused by the Constitutional Court- seemingly of illicitly attempting to influence Constitutional Court Justices (judges) into ruling in favour of ANC (African National Congress) and South African President Jacob Zuma- in a matter involving a corruption case against the president, is guilty or innocent of the charge against him, as a judge.

(The National Director of Public Prosecutions who attempted to Prosecute Jacob Zuma, was fired, the acting head dropped the case, leaving the public asking for details; the unit which had investigated Jacob Zuma, an anti-organised crime unit which had been known as the "Scorpions", was disbanded).

Even had the JSC found that Hlope was guilty, parliament, controlled via an ANC majority: by Jacob Zuma, would have to have been involved in any serious action against Hlope, the JSC investigation was- to the knowledge of our service- only advisory in status.

In an email dispatch sent out today: Helen Zille, the Leader of the DA (Democratic Alliance), South Africa's largest opposition party- slated the decision, saying of it:

"[The JSC's] decision is one of the most destructive early consequences of the Zuma administration's attitude towards our judiciary, and the consequences of a deferential and ANC compliant JSC. We now have a senior judge, and possible candidate for the Constitutional Court bench, who has a cloud of impropriety hanging above his head; a cloud that will not go away until the allegations are investigated and either confirmed or dismissed. Until such time as that happens, the integrity and independence of the judiciary will continue to be sullied"

In a statement the DA labled as:
"Helen Zille responds to the Judicial Service Commission's decision not to take the complaint against Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe to a full enquiry in her weekly newsletter, SA Today"

(Our two quotes of the Official Opposition and its Leader , are purely that, both speak in their own capacity. Quoting these figures does not mean that our service, or anyone associated with it in any way endorse or agree with the views we have here: quoted from a DA press release!)

Possible meaning of DA's statements involving Judicial Independence, may involve the following:

President Jacob Zuma has previously stated that the judiciary in South Africa act as though they are "God", and during his trials, his supporters threatened the public, and judiciary. Most notable among those threats which were against the public and others by Zuma supporters, were claims by the left- including trade unionists and leading ANC figures, that said persons would "Kill" for Jacob Zuma. During the rape trial against Jacob Zuma, which was said to be a weak case from the start, especially as the rape allegation was from an acquaintance of Zuma- Zuma supporters stoned a woman they incorrectly identified as Zuma's accusor. The woman who accused Jacob Zuma of raping her, has been informed by the National Executive Committee (NEC) of Jacob Zuma's ANC, that they will only guarantee her safety should she return from exile, if she withdraws the rape accusation against Jacob Zuma.

The statements in this article in no way whatsoever, in any way constitute any form of legal advice. They are provided for informative purposes, and are not legal advice.

As an internationally collaborative: initiative to provide a more transparent, accurate view of the world: This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine (quotations, or confers in this service/initiative, are provided to give perspective independently, or reference some external sources: and do not imply collaboration, or any kind of affiliation, or co-operation with other services, or initiatives, which are quoted or noted in articles)

Check the accuracy, and perspectives of our contents via the above listed search engine: against other "Catholic" services

Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Discuss our stories:
at our sub-forum on Catholic Answer Forums :

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, it is important for the growth of our service to know your views, and we hope you will leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (editor: marcaup@gmail.com)!

Or become a fan on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

Republic of South Africa: Top Ruling Party (ANC) politician- slams "Capitalists" opposed to proposed "communist" takeover of healthcare schemes by the government

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:51:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide; c.f. IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) via the Cape Times (Page 1) Monday 03 / 08 | August / 2009 ; article from SAPA [South African Press Association] (Secular; Independent; South African) 26 / 07 | July / 2009 ; from SAPA 30 / 06 | June / 2009 ; from Cape Argus 20 / 06 | June / 2009 ; from Daily News 15 / 06 | June / 2009 ; from page 4 of Tribune 26 / 07 | July / 2009 ; News 24 (Secular; Independent; South African) article by SAPA [South African Press Association] (Secular; Independent; South African) 08 / 06 | June / 2009 ; Mail and Guardian (South African; Independent; Secular; Liberal) article by Health-e News Service 02 / 06 | June / 2009 ; 15 / 09 | September / 2008 ; )

Article by Marc Aupiais

Blade Nzimande, the Republic of South Africa's: Minister for Higher Education and Training, and the General Secretary of the SACC (South African Communist Party), and a member of the National Executive Committe (NEC), of the ANC (African National Congress): which commands a majority in the South African parliament, and the Presidency- has slammed media bodies, and others, for criticizing the ANC's proposed NHI (National Health Insurance) bill- as the ANC continues to forge ahead with the controversial scheme ( IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) via the Cape Times (Page 1) Monday 03 / 08 | August / 2009 ). It has been reported, that there was speculation that World Renowned Barbara Hogan, was removed from the health Portfolio, due to Trade Union pressure, after she suggested that the bill be submitted to usual procedures and public scrutiny (Mail and Guardian (South African; Independent; Secular; Liberal) article by Health-e News Service 02 / 06 | June / 2009 ).

100 Billion Rand larger Health Budget?

According to Alex van den Heever, a health economist, who was quoted by HASA (The Health Association of South Africa), having spoken at their Durban Conference: the NHI is a ""completely unworkable, unaffordable solution that won't improve health services despite massive increases in expenditure""(News 24 (Secular; Independent; South African) article by SAPA [South African Press Association] (Secular; Independent; South African) 08 / 06 | June / 2009). According to van den Heever: part of the proposal is to increase the Health budget by 100 Billion Rand, an astronomical and unrealistic figure, especially during a recession, and as the ANC has put forward other plans slated as unrealistic by financial experts.

ANC NEC member: those opposing the plan are "capitalists"

Speaking on the 88th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party, Blade Nzimande said:

""The capitalist classes have already started a huge campaign in the media to try to discredit this system, and we want to say to them as communists today, war unto you.

"Prepare for a huge battle because we are going to mobilise the workers and the poor of the country to fight against you so we can have a national health insurance scheme."

Nzimande said the national health insurance scheme "aims to ensure every South African has access to health services without having to pay up front".

Public and private health care facilities would be open to all who wanted to use them.

"Everyone must have access to affordable and quality health care. How is it going to work? Those that are rich, they are going to pay more for this scheme. Those who are unemployed and with no income, will pay nothing, but everybody will get the same quality treatment." "
(IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) via the Cape Times (Page 1) Monday 03 / 08 | August / 2009 )

Further Criticisms

According to IOL:

"Critics have argued that the scheme would be too costly to implement and would not work if problems in the public health service - largely stemming from poor management - are not sorted out first.

Under the proposal, medical scheme members would pay 85 percent of the contributions, irrespective of the option they chose, to a global fund that would pay public and private sector providers."
(IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) via the Cape Times (Page 1) Monday 03 / 08 | August / 2009 )

December: In the Pipeline

South Africa's public health system is under a state of collapse: with doctors underpaid, and many professionals either entering the private sector, or leaving the country.

A draft on the NHI is expected by December 2009, the ANC plans to implement the NHI within the next 5 years. While the NHI is seen as- likely to go through; one possible reason that the head of the Communist Party, is so vehemently supporting his ANC allies- is that there have been rumours reported in the press last month- that some within the Communist Party, want to replace their General Secretary, or to oppose him in their December conference. The NHI proposal, like many other controversial legislative schemes now being put forward- has previously been pushed by now Zuma Allies. With a leftist president, it is much more likely to succeed.

Under ANC management- South Africa's previously world-class public health sector has collapsed under mismanagement and corruption. Some sources have asked that the ANC run Government firstly fix up the public health sector, before combining it with the private health sector. Others blame the move on covering up ANC incompetence and a lack of service delivery, which has caused violent rioting on the streets.

As an internationally collaborative: initiative to provide a more transparent, accurate view of the world: This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine (quotations, or confers in this service/initiative, are provided to give perspective independently, or reference some external sources: and do not imply collaboration, or any kind of affiliation, or co-operation with other services, or initiatives, which are quoted or noted in articles)

Check the accuracy, and perspectives of our contents via the above listed search engine: against other "Catholic" services

Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Discuss our stories:
at our sub-forum on Catholic Answer Forums :

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, it is important for the growth of our service to know your views, and we hope you will leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (editor: marcaup@gmail.com)!

Or become a fan on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

SADC Region: Republic of South Africa: Official Opposition in talks with strange bedfellows?

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:03:00 +0000

(South African Catholic)

Notation by Marc Aupiais

According to the Cape Argus, a member of the Independent Newspapers (IOL) news group: the Democratic Alliance (DA)- South Africa's Official Opposition: is in behind closed doors unity talks with several smaller parties- including ANC off-shoot: COPE (Congress of the People), the ID (Independent Democrats), and the UDM (United Democratic Front).

While the DA allows their Members of Parliament (MPs) to vote with their conscience, on matters deemed by the DA to be related to morality- the ID and UDM- have both pushed legislation and policies, which are seriously against the moral fibre set out by the Church- including on vitally important issues such as- what marriage should be, and legalising of and pushing of pro-abortion legislation by the state.

Much of the leadership of political fledgling- COPE- jumped ship from the ANC prior the last election- having seemingly been perfectly accepting of the ANC (African National Congress)- when it radically liberalised access to Abortion, and instituted "Civil Unions"- "Gay marriage". On the "Gay Marriage" issue- as our service noted in another article: earlier this year- the ID seemingly wanted to force marriage officers to "marry" gay couples- whatever their conscientious or religious objections.

Exactly what form of alliance would be formed if the alleged talks are successful- is not clear to our service at present.

Whether this would entail close co-operation on some matters between multiple parties, or a new political party- is not clear, although the evidence seems to lend towards the latter- as with the quotations the Cape Argus gives to back up its claims.

Reportedly: Helen Zille has noted a number of areas where the opposition parties could find common ground-

These apparently include: commitment to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996; creating an environment which would offer opportunities to everyone; a market-driven economy, opportunity and delivery and a safety net for the less privileged (c.f. IOL- as linked to below).

Representation of the DA had not replied to a media request from our service at the time of publishing.

C.F. IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 02 / 08 | 2009

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?from=rss_Twitter&set_id=1&click_id=79&art_id=vn20090802061851279C687881

UPDATE ON: South Africa: State to spy on cell phone, internet, emails of citizens to prevent crime?

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:51:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide; c.f. IOL (Secular; independent; South African): via The Star : 02 / 07 | July / 2009 )

Update by Marc Aupiais

It does seem from later press, that the RICA (Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication Related Information Act) act will require cellular companies to record, and archive in accordance with identifiable details of users: all voice communications over their networks, to be stored in the archive, which the state will have access to, via a court order, in a manner in which conversations can be linked to individuals. The act, as previously mentioned, would require text messages, and emails to be kept in an archive by cellular companies and seemingly also Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

IOL's The Star claims, as had IOL's Pretoria News, in a separate article:

"While cellphone operators will be obliged to keep a record of SMSes, emails and voice calls in an archive for access by authorities, cellphone calls can be monitored only with the permission of a judge."
(IOL (Secular; independent; South African): via The Star : 02 / 07 | July / 2009 )

As an internationally collaborative: initiative to provide a more transparent, accurate view of the world: This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine (quotations, or confers in this service/initiative, are provided to give perspective independently, or reference some external sources: and do not imply collaboration, or any kind of affiliation, or co-operation with other services, or initiatives, which are quoted or noted in articles)

Check the accuracy, and perspectives of our contents via the above listed search engine: against other "Catholic" services

Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Discuss our stories:
at our sub-forum on Catholic Answer Forums :

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, it is important for the growth of our service to know your views, and we hope you will leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (editor: marcaup@gmail.com)!

Or become a fan on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

South Africa: State to spy on cell phone, internet, emails of citizens to prevent crime?

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:34:00 +0000

F(Scripturelink Voters' Guide; IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 01 / 07 | July / 2009 ; 30 / 06 | June / 2009: Pretoria News ; 30 / 06 | June / 2009: SAPA; ; MSN (Secular; Independent) 29 / 06 | June / 2009; DOJ Press Release 30 / 06 | June / 2009)

Governmental Links:

Department of Justice and Constitutional Development:
Inter alia: Profile of Jeff Radebe
http://www.doj.gov.za/contact/cnt_min.htm

Press Release: 30 June

DOJ Press Release 30 / 06 | June / 2009
http://www.doj.gov.za/m_statements/2009/20090630-st-rica.pdf

Presidential Assent: By Jacob G. Zuma
http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/proclamations/2009-no39-gg32341-interception.pdf

We were not able to access the actual act, in order to analyze it ourselves, due to slow operating of a government site. And due to the confusing process this act underwent.

Dislcaimer:
This article does not constitute legal advice. It is based on interpretation of facts, as portrayed in different articles, of press group: IOL. Rely on it a your own risk.

Article by Marc Aupiais

It is advertised as a manner of pre-empting crimes. If the police can monitor you, they can stop something happening. This use of monitoring technology was successful, in one instance in Canada, when a certain Graham McMynn, was saved from captors, after police in Canada did an "emergency wire tap", allowed in Canadian law in those circumstances, without a warrant from a judge (MSN (Secular; Independent) 29 / 06 | June / 2009).

The problem with the South African version of legislation governing wire taps etc, where information is archived, and then accessed with the permission of a judge, requiring all cellular users to be registered, along with their place of residence, or nearby church or school, if they have no formal home, is that it is feared to be too much like big brother, as citizens can no longer use telecommunications anonymously.

According to the Department of Justice (And Constitutional Development), which says that from June first (Today), new cellular users will have to comply with the regulations: that they be registered, in order to buy a starter pack from network providers:

"The Act was necessitated by the fact that criminals make use of new technology to plan and execute crimes. These amendments are in line with similar legislation that has recently been adopted by many other countries across the world. The aim of the amendments is to assist the law enforcement agencies in the investigation and combating of serious crime and to ensure that the identity and whereabouts of the owner of a SIM-card who used a cellular phone in the planning and execution of a serious crime is known. Government will therefore work closely with the various services providers to ensure the successful implementation of this Act."
(DOJ Press Release 30 / 06 | June / 2009)

In South Africa, many customers of cellular services use prepayed airtime, which is bought from shops, and added onto their cellular account as they need it. Cellular companies in The Republic of South Africa have not traditionally been required to look into who were using their prepaid services.
IOL has been reporting for a while now on the: Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication Related Information Act (RICA), regulating inter alia, the tapping or interception of private communication sent via telecommunications structures.

According to IOL:

"The new act will force cellphone operators, including Internet and email service providers, to keep SMSes [What are known overseas as Texts: Small Message Service], emails and voice calls in an archive to allow for access by authorities."
(IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 30 / 06 | June / 2009: Pretoria News)

However, in later article, IOL note assurances from the South African state: that voice calls on cellular phones will not be illegally intercepted, and that interception of cellular phone based voice calls required the go-ahead of a judge. No public assurances about one's emails were to our knowledge: noted, and Cellular providers are already, to my knowledge: required to keep smses for a period of about 5 years. This later claim by IOL seems to contradict the previous, which we quote of them, as allegedly appeared in Pretoria News, unless cellular companies are to record all voice data sent through their networks, and unless, storage of voice calls is not what the minister there notes as interception. As we have been unable to find a copy of the act, we cannot presently elaborate.

IOL noted the allegations that part of the ANC ( African National Congress ) had used its power in the past, via state intelligence, to allegedly tap the conversations of political rivals. An allegedly tapped conversation, was allegedly used by President Jacob Zuma, whereby rival: Former President Thabo Mbeki, is alleged to have said some compromizing things as President, while speaking to a state employee, who was prosecuting Jacob Zuma on over 700 now dropped charges of alleged corruption, the conversation having been secretly monitored by the NIA (National Intelligence Agency), the alleged tapes of the conversation, had reportedly been given to Jacob Zuma's lawyer, and an acting National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) had dropped the case (His predecessor having been fired, by the ANC lead government).

IOL notes that access to the new archives will require the authority of a judge. The act probably will mean that many many personal private conversations will be acessible to the state: possibly in the future: going back years and years, hardly how the Canadian system of emergency tapping beneficially worked to save a captive. There reportedly is still the important requirement that a judge be involved, in taps which is notable. However: exactly what the act entails is cloudy. It seems to have been passed already in 2008, and IOL mentions 3 years of progress. There are certainly articles from 2006 on the RICA act, however. The confusion has meant that we have not been able to give our fuller coverage of this topic, especially as we do not have a copy of the act in our possession.

Analysis

On the surface, trust in the judiciary in South Africa, certainly is not at a high, especially as parliament has been alleged to have shown some influence over judges. Recent suggestion, by Jeff Redebe (Minister Jeffrey Thamsanqa Radebe): of amending sections of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, which are probably in place to ensure Judicial Independence, has also recently been reported.

While regulations have seemingly in the past required that cellular companies keep SMSes for five (5) years on their servers (I have visited MTN's foreign services backup centre, where they use impressive technology to store information), the newly enforced legislation could well mean that the State has access to many of your every digital, transferred electronic words. It could seemingly mean, that with the help of a single judge, your electronic past from a date some time prior: could be accessed, and seemingly brought before a court of law, and connected to you. An important part being that one would now have to prove who they were, give their Identity (ID) Number over to cellular services providers, and reveal where they live: or have their SIM card deactivated. This means that archives of your communication habits, could be linked to you. It is also of note, that the government states that the law is apparently necessitated due to a so-called need to monitor possible criminals in case they commit crimes.

As one's physical position may be gained from their cellular phone's location: via triangulation, it is also possibly concerning that all cellular phones will need to be registered. How secure the archives kept by telecommunications companies will be, is unclear to us. Telecommunications companies have 18 months allegedly, to register the details of all users, after which they will be charged R 1 00 000 (One Hundred Thousand Rand), per a day late.

The Republic of South Africa gives a Constitutional right ( in Chapter 2) to its citizens, of privacy, however the reported requirement of a judge's go ahead to access archives, and the fact that no rights given South African citizens are absolute, could mean that this act remains unchallenged. The authorities are desiring that proof of residence be given in person, for instance: via bank statements: by persons to their cellular companies, according to IOL. How this will affect the 2010 FIFA (Football / Soccer) World Cup, already reportedly in trouble due to alleged lack of interest in touring here: among foreign fans, is not immediately clear.

The legislation, is meant to combat crime, according to Justice Minister: Jeff Radebe (Minister Jeffrey Thamsanqa Radebe of The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development):

""The aim of the amendments is to assist law enforcement agencies in the investigation and combating of serious crimes, and to ensure that the identity and whereabouts of the owner of a SIM card who used a cell phone in the planning and execution of a crime is known," "
(IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 01 / 07 | July / 2009)

The later article by IOL quotes Jeff Radebe (Minister Jeffrey Thamsanqa Radebe) as saying that the legislation only allows the tapping of voice conversations over cellular phones, with the permission of a judge, and on the basis that it is reasonable to believe that a crime will be committed. If the Pretoria News article, as we have quoted it, was correct, then this would still leave unanswered: doubts involving the possibility of voice conversations being stored in an archive. The later statement, as noted seems different from IOL's claims in Pretoria News.

South Africa's intelligence agencies seemingly: already have a right, with a judicial warrant, to tap into phone conversations.

The legislation was signed by the President of the Republic of South Africa, Jacob G. Zuma, on the 18th June 2009, according to the DOJ website (No 39 of 2009: Signature 18th June 2009: http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/proclamations/2009-no39-gg32341-interception.pdf).

While accessing the DOJ (The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development) website, I was unable to find the actual wording of the act, nor to determine the exact meaning of the enactment of this legislation. I have thus been forced to rely on what Independent Newspapers (IOL) has said on this issue.

As an internationally collaborative: initiative to provide a more transparent, accurate view of the world: This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine (quotations, or confers in this service/initiative, are provided to give perspective independently, or reference some external sources: and do not imply collaboration, or any kind of affiliation, or co-operation with other services, or initiatives, which are quoted or noted in articles)

Check the accuracy, and perspectives of our contents via the above listed search engine: against other "Catholic" services

Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Discuss our stories:
at our sub-forum on Catholic Answer Forums :

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, it is important for the growth of our service to know your views, and we hope you will leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (mailto:marcaup@gmail.com)!

Or become a fan on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

South Africa: ANC want to redefine RSA provinces, in move attacked as possible power grabbing

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:04:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide; c.f. (IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 29 / 06 | June / 2009 ; (IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 07 / 11 | December / 2008 )

Article by Marc Aupiais

According to IOL in an article by Ainsley Daniels((IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 29 / 06 | June / 2009 ): Sicelo Shiceka, who is The Republic of South Africa's ruling ANC (African National Congress) Minister of the controversial Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs Ministry, has made claims of a report allegedly in which the ANC run South African State government, or officials in it are looking into reducing the number of provinces in South Africa. The provincial government of the opposition DA (Democratic Alliance) in the Western Cape (province) had previously alleged interfereance in provincial matters. The minister had claimed that even the Western Cape would be pressured by him. His ministry has certainly not eased tentions.

On December 07th 2008, when he, as a person, represented local government, involving the changes to the Constition of the Republic of South Africa as they related to the contentious and at times violent Khutsong Township issue, he was accused of undermining the central government((IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 07 / 11 | December / 2008). This would certainly be am about turn, if those allegations are true.

During apartheid, there were much fewer provinces, refelcting the politics of pre-apartheid Boer and British colonies, which had formed the Union of South Africa, and the 1910 Union Constitution in compromise, after the Second South African / Boer War, seemingly won by the British.

Any amendment to having 9 provinces, as with a separate effort to get rid of vital aspects of Judicial -Independence,( the latter pushed by minister of Justice and Constitutional reform: Jeff Redebe:) would require amending the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. With the enlargement of the opposition, the ANC could not introduce any of these plans into practice: without the help of opposition parties' Members of Parliament. If I am correct, they would also need the okay of provinces whose borders are affected to successfully legislate the prior. Acting without the confirmation of an applicable province, would require taking away the current Constitutional rights of the provinces to do so. To take away areas of provincial authority was apparently also suggested by the ruling ANC recently.

According to IOL(IOL (Secular; Independent; South African) 29 / 06 | June / 2009), critics of redrawing the provinces believe the ANC wants to redraw them to oust their DA opposition from the Western Cape province, where DA head: Helen Zille is premier.

SA Opposition, raises death of termanilly ill man in police custody

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:39:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide: Scripturelink's Politics covering branch)

Article by Marc Aupiais

The following Press release was sent to us, in a general press releases dispatch, from the DA (Democratic Alliance), the Official Opposition in The Republic of South Africa. In South Africa, the Opposition, has often taken the role of a watchdog, against the populist, ex-revolutionary ANC (African National Congress). The DA, are admittedly, by their own mouth: a Liberal Party, (with a history in vocal opposition to the previous Apartheid, Nationalist Government, which is maintained now, against the ANC) but are actually somewhat to the right of the Political spectrum in South Africa, and allow their Members of Parliament to vote with their conscience on what they name: moral issues. The DA speak in their own capacity, and this message is not to be seen as in any way necessarily representing the views, or presentations of our service, it is nothing but a quote of a source, if there are errors in their facts, we have not corrected them:

Title of Email Dispatch: "DA@WORK 22 June - The DA sets out its plan for Parliament"
Date of Receipt: 22 / (06) / June / 2009 [15:02 (+-2 hours ago)]
Permissions: I have been personally granted permission to reproduce the dispatches sent to myself by the DA, by their Leader's Office.

"Death of terminally ill inmate highlights inconsistent use of medical parole

The Democratic Alliance would be submitting Parliamentary questions into the death of a terminally ill inmate, saying an investigation was needed into why he was not released on medical parole and why he was not afforded the appropriate care required of a dying man with broken bones, the party announced last week.

Andries Johannes was serving a ten year sentence for attempted murder and was moved from Rooigrond Medium A Correctional Centre to the Leeuwkop Maximum Correctional Centre on 27 November 2008 reportedly to ensure his proximity to the Johannesburg General Hospital for the purposes of receiving medical care.

“He was taken to see doctors on various occasions but was not given any treatment,” said Shadow Correctional Services Minister James Selfe.

“A DCS medical report confirmed on 29 January 2009 that the inmate was suffering from lung cancer and was in the final stages of the disease with an estimated two months left to live.”

The correspondence from the Judicial Inspectorate indicated that the inmate had been recommended for medical parole.

This had not been followed and the decision was only communicated to his family a few hours before his death on 9 February 2009.

“In contrast to this, Schabir Shaik has controversially been on medical parole for almost four months and, as yet, there has been no attempt to review the validity of this parole decision,” Selfe said.

“ Despite various attempts by the DA to urge former and present Ministers of Correctional Services to refer the matter to the Parole Review Board, nothing has been done."

The DA was most concerned that inmates who qualified for medical parole were not being treated in an equal fashion.

“There is a need for an investigation into which inmates have been released on medical parole and which have been refused, in order to establish whether there is equality of treatment for all qualifying inmates,” Waters concluded."

Press Release from RSA opposition: Ouster clause in 18th Constitutional amendment bill torpedoes supremacy of Constitution

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:45:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide)

Note: the document for public comment, released by the ANC (African National Congress) run Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, may be reached at this URL: http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/invitations/20090601_GGNo32289.pdf it details the ammendments they desire!

The take of our sister site: Social Justice South Africa on this issue is available here:
http://southafricancatholic.blogspot.com/2009/06/social-justice-south-africa-anc-want-to.html

Article by Marc Aupiais

Disclaimer:

The following quotation does not in any way imply on our part: promotion, endorsement, or any agreement with either the Democratic Alliance (DA), or with their policies, or statements herein, or in general. The following is a quotation of a source: such is all it is:

We are publishing this statement: as the DA: is an important player in the political scene in South Africa, and usually an interesting source on politics, even being a political party, and having a bias themselves:

Press release sent out to us, and others, by the DA (we have used the full version from their site, rather than the shorter email version:)

"Ouster clause in 18th Constitutional amendment bill torpedoes supremacy of Constitution

Dene Smuts, Shadow Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
10 June 2009

Justice Minister Jeff Radebe is not getting off to a good start. The 18th Constitutional Amendment Bill, just published for comment, seeks to oust the jurisdiction of the courts on state liability just when he has created the perception that he intends to bend the will of the judicial authority to the executive arm of State by influencing the selection of judges by the Judicial Services Commission.

The amendment would stop the courts from striking down any provisions of the draft State Liability Bill for unconstitutionality even if the Bill, once enacted, failed to stop citizens being robbed of effective means of enforcement of money judgements against the State (thereby stripping them of their right of access to court and to the equal protection of the law).

The drafting of the Amendment shows that all this is quite deliberate: it says that "despite any other provision of the Constitution" the new Liability Act will prevail.

The DA has no illusions about the difficulties created by the Constitutional Court's majority judgement in Dingaan Hendrik Nyathi v MEC for Health, Gauteng. The tragic fate of Mr Nyathi, who sued the MEC for R1.5m after an incorrect surgical procedure following severe burns caused a stroke and disability, illustrates vividly the non-compliance by state officials with court injunctions described in a minority judgement as the true problem. The MEC conceded negligence, but before a final determination could be made, Mr Nyathi asked for an interim R300 000 to cover his medical and legal fees. The order was granted, but the MEC failed to comply. The problem, said Judge Nkabinde's minority judgement, in which Chief Justice Langa and Acting Justice Mpati concurred, is public administrative inefficiency. They also argued that a legal remedy was in fact available in the form of a mandamus.

But the simple fact is that the majority judgement requires Parliament to cure the shortcomings of the current section 3 of the State Liability Act, and that is what we must do - not reintroduce and immunise them. We certainly cannot put them beyond the reach of the Constitution, as the 18th amendment tries to do. We will not tolerate any ouster clause that torpedoes the supremacy of the Constitution.

We express the hope that the Minister and DoJ will go back to the drawing board and amend these Gazetted drafts before they are tabled in Parliament. The Constitutional Court's new deadline is the end of August, and the only hope of meeting it is to table constitutionally compliant amendment to State Liability - not to the Constitution."

Press Release from RSA Opposition: The National Health Insurance Plan: Why the DA opposes it

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:31:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters' Guide)

Note: the document for public comment, released by the ANC (African National Congress) run Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, may be reached at this URL:

http://www.doj.gov.za/legislation/invitations/20090601_GGNo32289.pdf it details the ammendments they desire!

The take of our sister site: Social Justice South Africa on this issue is available here:
http://southafricancatholic.blogspot.com/2009/06/social-justice-south-africa-anc-want-to.html

Article by Marc Aupiais

Disclaimer:

The following quotation does not in any way imply on our part: promotion, endorsement, or any agreement with either the Democratic Alliance (DA), or with their policies, or statements herein, or in general. The following is a quotation of a source: such is all it is:

We are publishing this statement: as the DA: is an important player in the political scene in South Africa, and usually an interesting source on politics, even being a political party, and having a bias themselves:

Press release sent out to us, and others, by the DA (we have used the full version from their site, rather than the shorter email version:)

"Ouster clause in 18th Constitutional amendment bill torpedoes supremacy of Constitution

Dene Smuts, Shadow Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
10 June 2009

Justice Minister Jeff Radebe is not getting off to a good start. The 18th Constitutional Amendment Bill, just published for comment, seeks to oust the jurisdiction of the courts on state liability just when he has created the perception that he intends to bend the will of the judicial authority to the executive arm of State by influencing the selection of judges by the Judicial Services Commission.

The amendment would stop the courts from striking down any provisions of the draft State Liability Bill for unconstitutionality even if the Bill, once enacted, failed to stop citizens being robbed of effective means of enforcement of money judgements against the State (thereby stripping them of their right of access to court and to the equal protection of the law).

The drafting of the Amendment shows that all this is quite deliberate: it says that "despite any other provision of the Constitution" the new Liability Act will prevail.

The DA has no illusions about the difficulties created by the Constitutional Court's majority judgement in Dingaan Hendrik Nyathi v MEC for Health, Gauteng. The tragic fate of Mr Nyathi, who sued the MEC for R1.5m after an incorrect surgical procedure following severe burns caused a stroke and disability, illustrates vividly the non-compliance by state officials with court injunctions described in a minority judgement as the true problem. The MEC conceded negligence, but before a final determination could be made, Mr Nyathi asked for an interim R300 000 to cover his medical and legal fees. The order was granted, but the MEC failed to comply. The problem, said Judge Nkabinde's minority judgement, in which Chief Justice Langa and Acting Justice Mpati concurred, is public administrative inefficiency. They also argued that a legal remedy was in fact available in the form of a mandamus.

But the simple fact is that the majority judgement requires Parliament to cure the shortcomings of the current section 3 of the State Liability Act, and that is what we must do - not reintroduce and immunise them. We certainly cannot put them beyond the reach of the Constitution, as the 18th amendment tries to do. We will not tolerate any ouster clause that torpedoes the supremacy of the Constitution.

We express the hope that the Minister and DoJ will go back to the drawing board and amend these Gazetted drafts before they are tabled in Parliament. The Constitutional Court's new deadline is the end of August, and the only hope of meeting it is to table constitutionally compliant amendment to State Liability - not to the Constitution."

Africa: SADC Region: South Africa: Elections: Final Voters Advice from our Service!

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:33:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

We hope our Voters' guide for this election is acceptable, the article on the 7 non-negotiables, and the comments from the Bishops' linked to, are both likely of some use also. Remember, God comes with us into the ballot box: we can sin, or do good via our vote. We therefore enter our article: note, if we excluded important issues: we can easily be informed, so we can include such:

With the "Mail and Guardian" predicting a 65% majority for the "ANC", and a relatively ok opposition, and "ENEWSCHANNEL" predicting a relatively more ok than "Mail And Guardian" predictions: opposition: these elections are paramount. And with the "Sunday Times" (I still deny reading it) which predicts a much larger percentage for the opposition: prior the "Mandela" stunt, we know firstly that these elections are important, and secondly that all voters count for this election.

With 66% of the Vote, and 6 of nine provinces, the "ANC" can just about ignore: via changing it: "South Africa"'s "Bill of Rights", and enjoy the joys which come with the ability to put forward any legislation which does not contradict the tiny "Section 1" of the constitution, and the section which entrenches section one and specifies procedures for amending the constitution.

"Jacob Zuma": said at their final election rally: that in all their years in power: the "ANC": has never altered the 1996 "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa": as a matter of fact, they have changed it many many times: including to allow, and then recently disallow "Floor Crossing".

As guessed, such a possibility of a 66% majority: may well be considered by many as "bad": especially as "Zuma" has frequently attacked the judiciary: saying they shouldn't have the final say: something very similar to the sentiment of the "Nats", also known as the "Nationalist Party" (Now incorporated into the "ANC"): just before they got rid of entrenched sections of the 1910 "Union Constitution": so as to get rid of "Coloured voters". Such statements by "Jacob Zuma" bring into question separation of powers.

As before: we recommend: due to their policies on the likes of abortion, gay "Marriage", conscience rights, prior "HIV" denialism, "Zimbabwe", "South Africa"'s "Security Council" record, and possible "genocide" etc: that Catholics NOT vote for the "ANC" this election: especially due to their Abortion and homosexual "Civil Unions" policies. Voting for a pro-abortion party, could well bring about the automatic excommunication specified in the law of the church.

Other parties we strongly advise (for the sake of obedience to canon law: and avoiding automatic excommunication by the Catholic church)that you do not vote for (if you value eating communion): are the "Minority Front" ("MF"), and the "United Democratic Front": "UDM".

The "ID": "Independent Democrats": also: gets a negative result, and we therefore advise you avoid voting for them: it allowed a free vote on allowing Abortion: it generally does not do free votes, and apposed conscientious objection: by Civil Marriage officers: on the "Gay Marriage" issue: and it not only supports "Civil unions"/"Gay Marriage": but refused to vote in favour of the "Gay Marriage" bill: because they thought marriage officers should be forced to marry homosexuals: and not be allowed to conscientiously object, on religious grounds. Such two separate situations: shows either a contradiction, or odd attitude.

Of other parties currently running in our election: which we do not have such clearcut opposition to:

"COPE", having senior members from the "ANC": takes on many of their troubles: previous votes FOR abortion, and Gay marriage, and issues like previous "ANC" denial of the existence of HIV/AIDS, and issues like Zimbabwe come into play. Granted, this party is a good thing for democracy, there are still issues, where they certainly have not denied their "ANC" past. Also, while no objection seems to have been made by members: when they were still part of the :"ANC": that does not mean they were present while voting: however: an "ANC" policy since 1994: that abortion should be a universal right: means that those who left the "ANC" for this party: seem to have by being part of the "ANC": been guilty of supporting abortion.

That said, they are a relatively new party. Their support for the death penalty: if allied with some others: is a cause for concern: for those pastoral (not doctrinal) moves by Catholic sources on this: have strongly apposed such a penalty throughout the modern world. Only a limited Death penalty would be allowed by doctrine in any case: and such is unlikely to be what follows in "South Africa".

As to parties, which are important within the electoral roll: and which we have looked into: in order to allow you to think what you desire of these:

The "DA", the major opposition: allows a free vote to their members: on moral issues. This makes them a relative neutral/wild card force on the voting plain: in theory: making them an acceptable party to vote for: especially as they do not support the death penalty, and seem concerned with human rights. Further, the general demographics of largely "Christian", and morally conservative "South Africa": make their MPs more likely to vote in a certain way. When recent abortion laws were introduced, it was noted that only a few of their MPs seemed to vote to allow such: granted they may have been concerned that mandatory counciling was not included in "South Africa"'s radical abortion laws. In practice: their vote depends on their MPs. A choice last year: to criticize the "ANC": on not voting for a "UN" ("United Nations") proposition to legalize homosexuality globally: had the unfortunate effect, of seemingly endorsing "Homosexual Civil Unions": due to certain language in the proposition: rejected as anti-religious discrimination by the "Vatican State". The "DA", denied that they meant any support to "Homosexual Civil Unions": by criticizing the ANC for not voting for the proposition. Claims which seemed possibly to suggest, or insinuate: that the "DA" was packing their ranks with gay activists: made by a gay activist, and member of the "Gauteng" list for the National executive put forward by the "DA": were also denied by the Chief of Staff: of the "DA"'s leader's office: directly to our organization: as with any possibility that proposed incentives not to get pregnant: to teenage girls could increase abortions: whereby the "DA": pointed out there would still be child grants. Both issues: would have little effect on their vote in parliament. The second relates to a money bill: only the "Minister of Finance" could put forward: making it an empty issue, and on the gay "marriage" issue: while the echelons of the "DA": deny any preference to homosexuals: the person claiming they were the party for "gays": was saying such to gain "gay" voters: in their "facebook" group. He certainly did not say they supported gay "marriage": only that they were a good party for "gay" people: analysis: seems to say he was attempting to get votes: based on making voters think something existed: which was not there. The "DA", allows a free vote, as recorded in historic decisions: on issues pertaining to "gay marriage": not mentioned by the gay activist who made such claims. The denial of any pro-gay discrimination by the "DA": seems acceptable. Also, Catholic social teaching does appose discrimination against gay persons: except in circumstances where their sexuality would be an issue of concern, and in the case of marriage: in that Catholic teachings label acting on homosexual desires to be of the matter of the mortal sin of lust.

The "DA": did appose "Apartheid": during its time, and has a policy allowing a "Free Vote" by MPs on moral issues.

Ultimately: as long as it only has the power of opposition, as it only will have: whatever your vote in this election: the "DA" remains a neutral vote in morality: and a vote against the ruling party.

The "African Christian Democratic Party" ("ACDP") apposes abortion strongly, but has not even an inkling of the support needed to institute changes to legislation: it does however, and should continue to have the support needed to put forward anti-abortion legislation, should the political scene change enough. It supports corporal punishment in schools: which in practice is most often abused, and is a strong supporter of the death penalty. While it is unlikely to get any headway against abortion: changes in the "Ruling Party" ("ANC"), may aid it in pushing through the "Death Penalty" via a change to "South Africa"'s constitution (amending the right to life). Such would be a negative. As guessed: it also apposed "Homosexual Civil Unions": when voted on.

The "Freedom Front Plus"/ "FF+"/"VF" : is largely an "Afrikaans" party, it supports the death penalty, as well as making comments about support for "Christian Values". It has previously voted against abortion, and "Homosexual Civil Unions": to our knowledge. It is unlikely to make any real headway against abortion: but may succeed in bringing back the death penalty, which would be a negative. It seemingly: in particular has an appeal and focus with and for "Afrikaans" voter demographics.

"IFP": "Inkatha Freedom Party": Every election, one hears of electoral violence between the "ANC", and "IFP": recently, even with images of "IFP" supporters running with weapons: granted: it could have been fear of "ANC" attacks that caused this: but the "IFP" and "ANC", are often reported as having followers in violence with each other. The "IFP" leader was Prime Minister of a "Bantu" state under the "Apartheid" government, of the "Nationalist Party". It seems to appose "Homosexual Civil Unions" and abortion, but like the "ANC": one could well be concerned about murders, violence, and other issues, which surface during elections: and about many other issues with the given party.

Who should you vote for?

We have provided some resources to help with this:

The 7 Non-negotiables (nicknamed the "Fates"): by the Scripturelink Voters' Guide:

http://scripturelinkvotersguide.blogspot.com/2008/09/7-non-negotiables-for-catholic-voters.html

Spread the news on Facebooks:
Catholics who don't vote pro-life risk automatic excommunication:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=33952638170

Catholic Voters Guide: the 7 non-negotiables:

http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=24662029507

Catholic Vote SA: tells Voters what the Bishops' Conference has said on voting:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Catholic-Vote-SA/65904035996

Do we endorse any one party in this election, or not want further input: no: we have tried with our limited resources: to compile some important information on major parties. Ultimately, your vote is on you. Our organization does not endorse any one party in these elections: however: we advise that you view the article on the 7 non-negotiables: it does help allot, it is based on "Catholic Answers Action": from "Catholic Answers"'s apolostate in America: which released their 5 non-negotiables for Catholic voters, which listed 2 not in play in America as a background.

Remember, your vote is your secret. Vote with an informed conscience: not for guilt, or party loyalty, not to fit in, not because others vote in a certain way. Your vote is between you and God: try to please yourself, your Conscience, and our God: while voting. We cannot make the choice for you.

While we have attempted to exclude errors: and to simply attempt to give issues, and reasoning, we may well have made errors, as is sometimes our experience with larger articles: kindly: please do inform us of errors, that we may correct them.

p.s. April 22nd is a Public Holiday: ensure you are able to vote if in the country: a site which may be useful is:

http://www.elections.org.za/

From the "IEC" : "Independent Electoral Board": of "South Africa": it should have details as to how and when to vote.

God Bless.

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Mandela backs Jacob Zuma!

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:35:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

In a situation in stark contrast to the past: when "Nelson Mandela" spent 27 years in prison in support of the communist affiliated (especially then) and pro-abortion (yes, also under "Nelson Mandela"/"Madiba") "ANC": "Nelson Mandela": is now attempting to help get the "ANC" ("African National Congress"): the 66% majority they need to change the constitution, including the "Bill of Rights".

The "ANC" has played a recorded speech from the Aged ex-president, in which he finishes with their slogan for the election. How aware "Nelson Mandela" is of the present circumstance in the country is uncertain. He did pitch up with "Jacob Zuma": to Ellis Park sports stadium, as seen on "ENEWSCHANNEL": and he did wave to crowds, but does not seem very able to stand up himself.

The "ANC" has received the most money from the taxpayer for their electoral campaign: and it is alleged by the "Mail and Guardian": that the "Chinese" government's ruling party: the "Communist Party", among others: have funded their extensive and expensive electoral campaign.

The "Zuma" party of the "ANC": recently ousted previous president "Thabo Mbeki", as president: who has not commented much on these elections. The "ANC", and their allies: has seemingly threatened violence against competitors: to annihilate: the "Democratic Alliance", to "Kill for Zuma", and "Jacob Zuma": seems to appose judicial review of parliament: as seen in his comments about Judges being like "God". "Jacob Zuma": does not believe that Ethnic Europeans, who are not Afrikaans: are "True South Africans": according to recent statements he has made during his campaign.

The "ANC": has introduced "Gay Marriage": and radical pro-abortion laws to "South Africa". A head of the "National Prosecuting Authority": who said he had a prima facie corruption case against "Jocob Zuma": was removed, and a successor dropped the case: based on what the Opposition has called "illegal" recordings of a conversation between the Former President, Thabo Mbeki: while in power, and the former head of the "Scorpions" ("South Africa"'s "FBI": which was disbanded having investigated "Jacob Zuma", among others: for corruption). "Shabir Shaik": convicted of a "Generally Corrupt" relationship with "ANC" President "Jacob Zuma": was recently released from jail of "Medical Grounds": his doctors: have said that he was not in fact at death's door, as would normally be required to release him.

With "Mandela"'s support, the "ANC": is more likely to get the 66% majority required to alter "South Africa"'s "Bill of Rights" (Chapter 2 of the "Constitution").

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Prepare for final advice before elections: from a ethics perspective

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:24:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

On behalf of Scripturelink News: so far as our understanding of Catholic Ethics:

We plan to write an article on the pros and cons of the different parties contending this election: before elections this year, we have begun to write this article, however: we have yet to publish it. We hope our readership shall read such before going to the polls.

So far, we can warn you of which parties we have placed utterly on our unacceptible vote list: the ANC, MF, and UDM: that is. We have also added the ID ("Independent Democrats") to this list, after archive research: has shown that they not only supported Gay "Marriage": but wanted to prevent persons from conscientiously objecting to marrying gay couples. There are also other issues with the ID.

We do plan to give a comprehensive article to our readers before the important day: April 22nd 2009. Which is in fact a public holiday!

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

South Africa: DA replies: incentive to not get pregnant: does not promote abortion

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:34:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

--DA wants to pay girls not to get pregnant?--South Africa currently has child-care grants--DA answers concerns over such incentives to prevent teenage pregnancy and possible abortion increase as side affect, and the genocide declaration--concerns related to policies possibly increasing abortion--under ANC imposed environment friendly to abortion--DA says the policy is not "population control"--and don't think their policy will increase abortion--The DA allows their MPs free vote on moral issues: meaning such an issue would reflect a change of stated policy if the DA were to knowingly increase abortions-- in response to concerns raised after notes about their manifesto in "South Africa"'s "Mail and Guardian" Newspaper-- which deemed the proposed incentives hard to implement-- The DA: says their proposed policy will not increase abortions--

After reading in the "Mail and Guardian": that the "DA": "Democratic Alliance": plans to give a possible cash or bursary incentive to those good little teenagers: who don't get pregnant: the Editor of "South African Catholic": brought Genocide and abortion concerns to "Gavin Davies": Chief of Staff for the "DA"'s Leader's office, via a email address which "South African Catholic" has access to. "South Africa" currently, fortunately gives out grants to mothers: to help care for their children.

The down side of such: is that it is seen as an incentive to get pregnant: however: taking away this grant: could radically increase abortions: under "South Africa"'s "ANC" forced: radical abortion laws. The "DA": "Democratic Alliance": has suggested adding a reward to teenagers to not get pregnant: without taking away the child grant.

The following is simply a quotation of a source, we do not guarantee the views of the "DA", by placing them here: Note: the "DA" ("Democratic Alliance"): is still: so far as abortion, and gay "marriage" and other important issues are concerned, along with most important opposition parties: on our acceptible vote list:

(Parties which have made our unacceptable vote list are: The "ANC" ("African National Congress"), "MF" ("Minority Front"), and "UDM" ("United Democratic Front"), (while it has not made our service's bad list: there are also concerns over the leadership of "COPE" ("Congress of the People"): a party which formed, as a breakaway from the "ANC" already after the "ANC": began to force upon the country pro-abortion, and pro-"Homosexual""Marriage" legislation): all of which have in practice ("COPE" had not formed yet, but senior members were part of an "ANC" which had) shown a preference for voting in what pro-life, and pro-family activists: would consider an extremely dangerous manner: so far as abortion, and/or homosexual unions are concerned.)

The quotation from the "DA": "Democratic Alliance"'s "Gavin Davies" is as follows:

"Dear Marc

Thank you for your email.
In our manifesto, we say that we will investigate ways to give young girls an incentive not to fall pregnant before they reach the age of 21. This could be in the form of a bursary or another similar financial incentive.

We say this because we recognise the damaging effects that having a baby at a young age can have on a young girl or woman’s life. It can limit her chances to finish her education and it can constrain her career prospects.

This is not a form of control. It is an incentive. Nobody can force anyone not to get pregnant and the DA certainly does not advocate population control.

On your second point regarding the possibility that such an incentive might encourage teenage abortions. We do not believe that this would be the case. There is already a child support grant that young mothers in financial need are eligible to receive. Should a young woman fall pregnant and have a child, they would still be eligible for a child support grant.

I hope this answers your question sufficiently.

Best wishes
Gavin Davis"

Does the "DA" ("Democratic Alliance") reply display adequate, or relevant, and accurate enough facts to justify their choice of addition to their manifesto: this service does not guarantee such, nor say otherwise. It is our job to give you the facts to vote with informed conscience. The "Mail and Guardian" article claims that such incentives would be hard to implement. As per usual: the "DA"'s ("Democratic Alliance") swift response to our concerns shines with the professionalism we are used to gaining as a member of the media. That does not mean/imply we endorse the party mentioned, nor that we endorse their views on this, or other issues.

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

Food for votes: not OK: Democratic Alliance: on reports of alleged ANC corruption

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:54:00 +0000

(Scripture link Voters Guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

Some related stories in the SA secular press: i.e.: on the issue of the ANC: allegedly using state food aid: in order to affect elections:

IFP (Inkata Freedom Party) on one claim of such:
from News24 (Independent; South African; Secular)
http://www.news24.com/News24/Elections/News/0,,2-2478-2479_2492028,00.html

"ID" on such claims: "Independent Democrats" think "IEC" toothless
from Politicsweb (South African; Secular; independent)
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71654?oid=125083&sn=Detail

DA lays complaint on allegations that the ANC is using Food Grants to leverage voters:
From IOL (4 days ago): (Independent; South African; Secular): on the same issue:
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3086&art_id=nw20090414145849853C214595

We received the following release from the "DA" ("Democratic Alliance")- quite a while ago, however: our primary internet center has been down for a while, and we have not generally been able to publish. The following is nothing but a quote: mentioning such statements by the "DA" ("Democratic Alliance"): is by no means an endorsement of the said statements: nor a guarantee of the accuracy of allegations possibly made by the "DA" ("Democratic Alliance"):

Contents of release we received, via email from the "DA": some time ago:

"DA to lay complaint with Public Protector about "food for votes" allegations

The Democratic Alliance has noted with great concern fresh allegations in media reports of the ANC enticing voters with food parcels in numerous provinces.

“Alarmingly, this dishonest form of electioneering is conducted using taxpayers’ money, involving officials from the Department of Social Development,” said DA spokesperson on social development Janet Semple.

“The DA has raised this issue on numerous occasions and these new allegations prove that this is only the tip of the iceberg.”

Semple said, that based on this new evidence, the DA will write to the public protector requesting an investigation into the possible abuse of state resources.

“Should any individuals wish to come forward to confirm the solicitation of votes with food parcels or any other form of social grant, they can contact Mike Moriarty at 082 492 4410 or email info@da.org.za "

South Africa: Zuma: Non-Afrikaaner whites: are not "true" South Africans

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:40:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide ; c.f. IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 02 / 04 / 2009; 02 / 04 / 2009 )

Article by Marc Aupiais

A disturbing quote by Jacob Zuma: has entered the Mass Media:

""Of all the white groups that are in South Africa, it is only the Afrikaners that are truly South Africans in the true sense of the word," " says "Jacob Zuma": "ANC" ("African National Congress") President: probable future "South African" "President".

(Zuma's apparent statements: are: as: quoted from: IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 02 / 04 / 2009; )

The "DA" ("Democratic Alliance"): via "Member of Parliament" ("MP"): "Desiree van der Walt": has challenged comments by "ANC" President "Jacob Zuma": that "Afrikaans" "Whites": are the only "truly" "South African" "whites": a seeming slur on "English speaking" "White" persons in "South Africa": presented to "Afrikaans" potential voters. "Zuma" previously escaped with comments that "Afrikaaners" were the only true "White Tribe": the "DA", says his latest comments: are unconstitutional.

The "ANC": "African National Congress"; "South Africa"'s current "Ruling Party": has already amalgamated with the "New Nationalist Party" ("NNP"), which in Apartheid: while known as the "Nationalist Party": ensured white rule, racial segregation: and the police persecution of Black and white opponents of their "Apartheid" system. The "ANC": in seeking "Afrikaner" votes: has frequently: seemingly endangered the "Constitutional" view of other Ethnically: "European" South Africans: seemingly making them even further fear: the focus of government policies already entrenched: of discriminating against "white" South Africans.

Meanwhile: the same "ANC"'s "treasure general": "Mathews Phosa" asked "Afrikaans" "South Africans" to stay in the country: something which again seems to be a reference to "ANC" discrimination for the same people who were advantaged most by "Apartheid": while "English" Speaking Citizens of "South Africa" were second class citizens: followed by different races in order.

"Phosa" assured "Afrikaans" "South Africans" that they would not be discriminated against: via them, as noted by IOL: "Phosa said there was no room for discrimination at the SABC or anywhere else in the country.
"(IOL (Independent; Secular; South African) 02 / 04 / 2009)

The Ethnicity obsessed "ANC run" "South African" State: continues to openly support policies which judge whether or not a person gets into Varsity, becomes a judge: or gets a job: based on the colour of their skin, and what sex they are. That these words are addressed to Afrikaans voters, and not white people in general: has raised further concerns over a perceived "ANC" prejudice: for one "White" man over another.

Further: these comments create "Apartheid" era fears: that (this time) non-"Afrikaans" "whites": may be chased out of the country: as the "Zimbabwean" farmers were.

"ANC" policies: such as "BEE" ("Black Economic Empowerment"), "BBBEE" ("Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment")), AA ("Affirmative Action"), and others: often involve companies noting in advertising for a job: that they desire a person of certain ethnicity: so as to not be penalized by "South African" Race based regulations: many companies: once they reach a certain size: need to have a certain proportion of "Black" owners: and a certain portion of "Black" (non-"white") employees working for the company, as well as a certain minimum amount in management. Fully "Black owned" companies are celebrated in "South Africa": a company with a certain ration of "Black" owners: is called a "Black Chip" company. many industries suffer due to a shortage of "Black" skills, while "white" persons with these skills are unemployed. There are no real measures to ensure any amount of Minority "White" ownership in "South Africa": and many "White" "South Africans": have left the country: in search of job opportunities elsewhere.

Following threats of violence against the "DA", and other alleged "Counter-revolutionaries": including judges: the "ANC": has continued to create fear among "White" and peace-loving "South Africans".

From our Sister Site:

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and appropriate, legally compliant, and cordial emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or become a fan, or follower of our pages on Facebook:

South African Catholic News Service- Page - the notes that we add: are generally: our articles from this service

Interested in the: Scripturelink Search and Information service- Page, or want to see our google reader: Shared Items: click here

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

South Africa: DA Students Org. allege serious ANC corruption at Student Rep. Council at the University of Witwatersrand JHB

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:21:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide ; Social Justice South Africa )

Disclaimer/Note: from our own Editor: Marc Aupiais

While we are forwarding this message: received as sent out by Gavin Ray, the President of DASO-Wits: due to public interest: we must note that we neither imply endorsement of the contents, of this said message: nor guarantee the accuracy, or truthfulness of the statements of the DASO-Wits President: in the email he has sent out to us. This is not an endorsement of DASO, nor of their version of events: however: the DA, unlike the ANC: are on our acceptable vote list. We therefore publish this email, here received: concerning allegations of corruption on the Students Representative Council: as nothing but a quotation of an of interest and important source on the matter.

The DA's representation at varsities: is DASO: the ANC is represented by the "Progressive Youth". Hellin ZIlle, is an ex-ANC member: and struggle hero: who faced Jail time: over her coverage of the assassination of an ANC member: during the Apartheid era.

Details of Message Received from the Democratic Alliance Students' Organization at the University of the Witswatersrand, at 17:20 (49 minutes ago);

"---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DA Students Organisation - Wits
Date: 2009/3/22
Subject: An explanation for the DASO controversey
To: marcaup@gmail.com"

Contents of message received:

"Dear DASO members

As I’m sure you all know by now- DASO and I have been the centre of attention from all fronts for the last three weeks- culminating in the media frenzy now surrounding Ilan Solomon’s (Clubs and society’s Officer, member of ASD) resignation (later withdrawn- after my and others’ encouragement for him to stay on); and the battle between the defenders of the constitution (WITS legal office) and those that would bend it (some members of the SRC). While I’ve tried to let the process finish its course before speaking out- it seems that I am destined to be in limbo for some time to come and as such thought it pertinent to give you my side of the story.

My tale begins on a Monday of great misfortune as I am referred to a mysteriously set-up Disciplinary Committee (DC) of the SRC. To my horror I received an email the next day informing me that my crimes of missing deadlines, yawning in 5 hour long meetings, and three other barrel-scraping stories- justified my expulsion.

As I’m sure you can imagine this blind justice saw me rush to write an appeal that I promptly sent to the Dean of Students. However- before I knew it a Vuvuzela journalist had been leaked the information of my “expulsion” before even my first appeal (SRC has never taken this breach of communication seriously but it seems ready to pounce on Ilan for his). The journalist promptly wrote an article saying that I was expelled for smashing a golf cart. To those concerned- the golf cart is fine. Please pass by Jubilee residence to see it if you don’t believe me.

After hearing that on the Tuesday evening of my expulsion the SRC had a meeting where members blasted the DC for its decision- I handed my appeal over to members of the SRC executive for my next stage of appeal. On Thursday evening I sacrificed a rare dinner with my family to instead enjoy the company of the Executive Committee. I had sent them my appeal in the morning (which Yandiswa Xhakaza (ANCYL) had not read) that expressed my disappointment in myself for not having set an above-reproach standard of work, but that I had done a lot.

After a fantastic weekend spent much like a suspect rotting in a cell waiting for the verdict (they needed four days to decide); I heard the most astonishing story. Guys- get ready for politics at its most underhanded:

- The Executive Committee had decided to overturn the expulsion and replace it with a suspension.

- The SRC was promptly presented with an ultimatum- agree to suspend Gavin, with a two-thirds majority (66%); or we’ll translate your no vote as support for his expulsion.

- And so, yes ladies and gentlemen; somehow the situation arose that equates to me needing a two-thirds majority vote of SRC to stay in- even though it says in the constitution that you need a two thirds majority to expel!

- 45% of SRC is ANCYL- so a two-thirds majority to overturn my expulsion was impossible

Scheming scheming scheming…

The next week the Dean of Students, Prem Coopoo, with the whole of legal office behind her informed SRC, including me, that the expulsion was illegal and did not follow due procedure. The constitution- for good reason- is clear that you have to have a two-thirds majority vote of no confidence to expel a member of SRC, not two thirds to keep them in! “Yay” I thought- finally some justice. “Oh no”- I found out; the SRC was fighting. It said it was right and they were wrong.

Apparently though- not all of SRC felt legal office was wrong. This week in fact- the stranglehold they have on members to keep them from telling the truth was too much for Ilan and he spoke out. He is not alone but for the sake of trust I’ll let other SRC members come out in their own time.

I want to applaud Ilan for his bravery and commitment to principle. He put truth before expediency. He has been honourable and the SRC should be ashamed of firing at him for speaking out. Ilan has totally reformed the Clubs and Society’s portfolio and I challenge anyone to find a past CSO officer who has worked harder and done more. Much like the ANC government- some in the SRC have shown that they prize blind-loyalty above work performance and hiding the truth over revealing it.

Now to reassure you, I am more committed than ever to serving the students of WITS- in or out of the SRC; and DASO is here to stay. I’ll give you all an update on the possibility of our organisation facing deregistration for Helen Zille’s visit soon- but know we will fight tooth and nail to keep the alternative to cronyism alive on Campus.

In conclusion- I found this verse very encouraging to me in the face of underhanded schemes and plotting:
“Fools find pleasure in wicked schemes; but those who have understanding delight in wisdom.” Proverbs 10

Feel free to contact me if you don’t yet feel at ease!

Yours truly,

Gavin Ray

DASO-WITS president"

A note from our Sister Site: (Below)

Have comments on our articles, join our online social networks:

at Catholic Answer Forums' : Catholic Social networking

South African Catholic News Service (group)

Or Join us on Facebook

South African Catholic News Service

Otherwise, please rate our articles, and feel free to leave appropriate, legally wise, and compliant and cordial comments, and appropriate, legally compliant, and cordial emails (marcaup@gmail.com (Not necessarily the Author of this article) ; email our editorial staff)!

Or Subscribe to our articles via email:

Subscribe to South African Catholic

We also have a site on twitter:

http://twitter.com/sacns

And one on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/user/SACATHOLICNEWSSERVIC

This service is brought to you by the Scripturelink Search Engine

Check our contents via the search engine: against other Catholic services

Add your email to our system to: subscribe to: "South African Catholic News Service"'s dispatches: via email

View Archives

South Africa: DA Leaders office denies any pro-civil-union discrimination

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:33:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

In response to a request for clarity on seeming insinuation of DA discrimination for Homosexual candidates, the DA, has responded to our concerns. Gavin Davis, the Chief of Staff of the Da's Office of The Leader, whom I have corresponded with in the past, has responded to our concerns on behalf of Christian voters. The following is an email reply we received from him today:

2009/3/10 Gavin Davis
Dear Marc

Thank you for your email.
As I mentioned in previous correspondence, DA public representatives have a free vote on issues of conscience including civil unions. To my knowledge, Mr Ollis has never said that the DA is for civil unions. He has expressed his personal view, which he has every right to do. But it does not represent the view of the party.

As far as the DA’s lists are concerned, there is no discrimination either for or against people from any particular group, whether based on race, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

I hope this answers your question.

Kind regards
Gavin

We have asked that the DA monitor their facebook group better, and are pleased that their national policy seems the same. It does seem odd, that Ian Ollis, should make such a point, as he did, and that he seems to have insinuated certain things, which would make the DA a less acceptable party to vote for.

As it is, they maintain their status on our acceptable vote list. Due to the positions of their leadership. We do hope that the DA will look into the claims by Ian Ollis, involving the Gauteng list, and sexual orientation.

South Africa: DA's SA Christian voters lose say?

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:03:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide)

Note: the DA's leader's office's head of staff replied to our request: http://southafricancatholic.blogspot.com/2009/03/south-africa-da-leaders-office-denies.html

Article By Marc Aupiais

Recently, we came accross the following:

"

Post #1

Ian Ollis wroteon February 25, 2009 at 1:49pm

Ok, so huge numbers of people have been asking about the gay thing, so I decided we should start a discussion on the board! Currently, the DA has a large number of gay (LGBTI) people as public rep's either as MP's MPL's and Councillors around the country. Yes, I am one of them! On our election lists for the 2009 general elections, I was extremely happy to see the number of gay people that have been chosen on the lists for parliament and the various provinces as candidates. A case in point is the Gauteng Parliamentary Candidates list. I am currently one of 5(that I know of) gay or lesbian people in the top 16 positions on the list. That is a huge plus for the party and for our representivity. Show me one other party in SA that has that many? An many of us, like myself, Mike Waters, Paul Willemburg are very out about our sexuality. we are not a pink party however. We support equal rights for gay people, just as we support say, the equal rights of both genders, all races and each language group in the country. For those of you out there who are thinking of voting DA and for whom this is an issue, rest assured, the DA is the party that most represents the rights and views of gay people and not just in words. we have actions that support what we say! Viva Helen Viva!"

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=2226300562&topic=7506

Ian Ollis, is the 11th member listed on the DA's GAUTENG NATIONAL ASSEMBLY LIST listing. I see no reason to discount that the person speaking is him.

Last year, when asking the DA, whether or not they had altered their policy on gay marriage, their answer to our organization was no: they still had no policy. This was after a decision involving Internation Politics, which technically favored "Gay Marriage".

We have requested a reply from the Democratic alliance, on this issue, since, having seen this admittal by a potential MP.

This was posted on their facebook group.

The DA, has also refused to alter the constitution, so that abortion is clearly relegated to the criminal arena, as any South African, no matter their age, can legally request an abortion. The only restrictions in South Africa, seem to focus on protecting the mother's health. The Judiciary, largely seems to have a certain view of the Constitution, and some believe that if South Africa's abortion laws are overturned, they will overturn the nullification of ANC: African National Congress: policy. This trial has yet to occur however.

Such moves either mean nothing, or everything. The DA would not have succeeded in changing the constitution, and so their choice had no effect, but they seemed to say that the constitution was over in 1994.

If the DA values their Pro-life, pro-family, pro-catechism voters, I suggest that they clarify this issue: as one of their representatives seems to be saying that they have purposely placed a large portion of homosexual voters on their parliamentary list high up. Such would mean a pragmatic change in a possibly neutral vote on a pro-life issue: marriage.

Such calls into account: how does the DA stand on other issues of policy, such as abortion: another issue, of importance to Christians voting. If they are that sort of "liberals" now, leaving what I would have thought was the PFP behind, then: where else are they liberal. America's Democratic Party has jumped on both issues, so have many others. Such concern lies not in homosexual ideas, which generally may change from each to each: but what is considered liberalism in many nations.

Both support of "Gay Marriage", and support of abortionist policies, are issues which make a party very unlikely to be the best for Catholic voters. The question is whether or not the DA is still neutral on these issues, or if they simply are officially neutral, but have hidden practical policies.

I would like it if the DA were to reply to my request.

Can the DA say that it is still neutral on these morally concerning issues to Christian voters?

If the man above is not Ian Ollis, I request that the DA inform us, as it is, I suspect it is the DA potential Parliamentarian, and I hope that the DA, is not discriminating against heterosexuals in their representation in parliament.

Africa: SADC: South Africa: Corruption and Politics: Shaik (accused of a currupt relationship with ANC president) shakes off 15 year jail sentence

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:47:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters guide; Social Justice South Africa; IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 03 / 03 / 2009; Letters sent to IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) on the 04 / 03 / 2009; IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 04 / 03 / 2009; IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 04 / 03 / 2009; 03 / 03 / 2009)

Article by Marc Aupiais

Shabir Shaik: convicted of having a "Generally Corrupt" relationship with the Ruling (with a majority capable of changing the constitution of SA, which has changed said constitution numerous times) ANC (African national Congress) President Jacob Zuma, has just been "permanently" let off a 15 year jail sentence for corruption, 2 days after a press release by Jacob Zuma, that he would pardon Shaik on possibly becoming president of South Africa.

"Shaik was sentenced to 15 years in jail in 2005 after he was convicted on two counts of corruption and one of fraud. This was based on evidence of a corrupt relationship between himself and then South African and ANC deputy president Jacob Zuma.

At the time of going to press on Monday night, there was a lot of activity at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital in Durban, where Shaik had spent a good deal of his incarceration."

(IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 03 / 03 / 2009)

The ANC, largely backed by uneducated masses of South Africa, who suffer from lack of education, and basic resources: after over a decade of ANC rule, is mooted to win a majority, as usual in this year's elections. When a Constitutional challenge on election rules, preventing South Africans abroad from voting: hit: the ANC set the election date in April: this may well prevent the constitutional claim from succeeding. Millions of South Africans have left the country since 1994, due to openly racist business and other regulations set by the government: which has seen incalculable damage to South Africa's economy, due to a non-white skills shortage, and also the leaving of many South Africans due to crime, and a general perception among many: that whatever they want, the government will do as it desires.

Opposition parties have, in recent years, whether purposeful, or incidently: had the police used against them. DA leader Hellen Zille was arrested in Cape Town, by police, while objecting on crime. ANC offshoot: COPE, was prevented from taking to the streets, to campaign after a national congress, by Riot Police, as the ANC suddenly had a meeting nearby. No mention of Riot Police by the ANC talk was mentioned. With Voter intimidation in recent By-Elections, and ANC supporters alleged by the DA, to have been bussed in, and attempting to blockade a DA rally in a township, these are just some of the worries: not excluding murders in Kwazulu Natal; where IFP and ANC supports are alleged to have taken part in violence in previous elections. High ranking members of the ANC's Triparteid Alliance: have said that they will take up arms for Mr Zuma's cause, and there have been comments regarding what seems, for lack of adequate clarification like a physical annihilation of the DA (Democratic Alliance), South Africa's major opposition party.

According to the State, which has let Shaik off due to "depression", and "high blood Pressure", Shaik will not be sent back to jail, if these "symptoms" suddenly disappear. The State has also refused to release exactly what "terminal" condition Shaik has: only mentioning what could be signs of someone actually being in prison.

"It should be noted that in terms of section 75 (8) of the Correctional Services Act (Act 111 of 1998), the 'decision of the board is final' and can only be reviewed by the Correctional Supervision and Parole Review board, led by a judge," Wolela said."
( IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 03 / 03 / 2009)

As the law requires a prisoner to be terminally ill to be released, it seems odd, that a terminal illness has not been mentioned. In fact, unless Shaik kicks the bucket within days, or weeks, it raises the question on HIV Positive prisoners, who have been denied parole until their last legs. Perhaps Shaik needs a change in diet, having spent most of his time in hospital, over what many may see as symptoms of stress, and being in jail.

IOL, probably South Africa's most reliable news source, has more to say, by airing letters sent on the issue, which I think are an interesting read:

Like many South Africans: who have seen so much in the interesting way in which ANC supporters of high rank usually don't feel too discomforted when faced with "prison", many South Africans seem suspicious. Others want more details: some think that fraudsters should not go to jail.

(Letters sent to IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) on the 04 / 03 / 2009)

IOL notes that the state is refusing to review the choice, or to give it up to review, despite the fact that the ANC controls the government, and: "Shaik was sentenced to 15 years in jail in 2005 on two counts of corruption and one of fraud, which, among other things, related to an alleged bribe he negotiated between Zuma and a French arms company. - Sapa"IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 04 / 03 / 2009; IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 04 / 03 / 2009). Zuma is president of the ruling ANC.

The African National Congress denies ( IOL (Independent; South African; Secular) 04 / 03 / 2009) any influence in the release of Shaik, while the DA, among others is seeking some form of action over the surprise the release of Shaik, due to his "High Blood pressure" "etc".

IOL quoted a source, which tries to get prisoners rights insured, it was noted that 2500 prisoners die a year, it seems these did not get this parole. Many prisoners have been subject to denials of medical parole, and it is probably a unique case, that Shaik should get it for depression and high blood ( 03 / 03 / 2009: IOL) pressure, with possible "chest pains". Why the public has been denied so much information on this case is odd, especially due to the following:

"32. Access to information

Everyone has the right of access to

any information held by the state; and
any information that is held by another person and that is required for the exercise or protection of any rights.

National legislation must be enacted to give effect to this right, and may provide for reasonable measures to alleviate the administrative and financial burden on the state."

(Bill of Rights, Chapter II of the Constitution of the "Republic of South Africa" 10 December 1996)

Democratic Alliance (Democrats) Launching Election Manifesto

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:21:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters guide)

Article By Marc Aupiais

The DA (Democratic Alliance), has sent out an email speaking of their manifesto launch. As they are on our acceptable vote list: we have determined to inform you of this:

Details of Email:

"
from DA News
to "sanlameer@gmail.com"
date 12 February 2009 18:10
subject DA MANIFESTO LAUNCH LIVE ON TV
"

Contents Of Email:

"DA MANIFESTO LAUNCH LIVE ON TV

Democratic Alliance (DA) Leader Helen Zille and DA Federal Chairperson Joe Seremane will, this Saturday 14 February 2009, launch the DA’s 2009 election manifesto in Johannesburg.
This fully-costed programme of action will set out in detail how the DA intends to make its vision of an open, opportunity society for all a workable and sustainable reality in South Africa.

DATE : Saturday, 14 February 2009
TIME : 11h00 - 12h00
WHERE : Broadcasting live on SABC 2 and SAFM"

South Africa; SADC Region, Africa: DA (Democratic Alliance) Alleges possible ANC scandal

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:05:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide)

Article by Marc Aupiais

We do not endorse the views of the DA (Democratic Alliance), nor do their views represent us, these quotations are not endorsements, nor guarantees of the accuracy: of the statements made by South Africa's major opposition party.

A letter sent out from Helen Zille, via email today: says:

"Reports surfaced this week that President Kgalema Motlanthe is poised to appoint Muzi Wilfred Mkhize as the next National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) to succeed Advocate Vusi Pikoli.

If this happens, it will trigger a constitutional crisis.

Advocate Mkhize was a member of Jacob Zuma’s defence team when Zuma first appeared in the Durban Magistrate’s Court on corruption charges in October 2005. Under no circumstances should Mkhize be put in a position to decide whether or not his former client should be charged with 783 counts of fraud, bribery and corruption. That would constitute a clear conflict of interests.

If President Motlanthe appoints Mkhize, it will be clear why the ANC nominated Motlanthe as President when Thabo Mbeki was “recalled” last year. The conclusion would be irresistible that the ANC required Motlanthe to appoint a compliant National Director of Public Prosecutions who would make the charges against Zuma go away. Then Zuma would have a clear run for the Presidency without the cloud of an imminent corruption trial over his head. The first step was to fire Pikoli. The second step, according to this line of analysis, is to appoint a Zuma man as the country’s chief prosecutor, in accordance with the ANC’s infamous deployment policy."

Among other things.

The DA, is calling for the NPA to be appointed by an independent body, rather than the government. The DA campaign for elections: is to prevent Mr Zuma getting the Two thirds majority, which the ANC got last elections: which gives them absolute power over South Africa. Motlante was not elected as President of South Africa, and the current ANC leadership, were not elected by the people at the polls.

Thabo Mbeki, the previous president of the country: was president when the ANC were elected into office, once again. The ANC removed him after a judge, not judging Mbeki, but whether or not Mr Zuma, could be tried for multiple corruption charges, alleged a conspiracy against Mr Zuma, by Mr Mbeki. Zuma used the opportunity to rally his forces, and force South Africa's then President to resign: without an Election by the people, Mbeki was replaced by Motlante, in accordance with the laws set out by the communist affiliated ANC government.

Important figures in the ANC, have previously called for the "Annihilation" of the DA, and have said that they are prepared to kill and die for ANC president Jacob Zuma, who dodged rape claims recently: having been found innocent. The woman, who accused him of rape, is an HIV sufferer, currently in exile outside South Africa, fearing for her life, after Zuma supporters stoned a woman, who they thought was her. The ANC only will guarantee her safety, if she withdraws claims of rape. Zuma's supporters, do not deny that he was having extra-marital sex with her. They say that she actually stayed the night: and had breakfast: and that this is a sign that she enjoyed having relations with Mr Zuma. Zuma claimed that he took a shower afterwards: in order to avoid getting aids.

Archbishop Buti, of Johannesburg, recently expressed fears, that South Africa's government would not be accountable to the people after this years constitutionally needed elections, and fears: that Mr Zuma will not receive a trial on corruption charges; that a "political solution" would be used. What he feared, likely referred to the possibility, that Zuma would change South African law: to avoid prosecution. The DA claim, however: is a bit different, they allege the possibility, that what may be seen: as below board methods will be used: to further prevent a Zuma corruption trial, something Zuma, after asking for a day in court, has fought on every level he could.

Fear of electoral violence, after voter intimidation in recent by-elections, and in a mirror image of some previous times: is real, and feared in South Africa. The future, of the important regional power: is murky, and dangerous. If South African mediation efforts, and troops are withdrawn from across the continent, due to local issues: an even more dire situation could occur.

Attacks, or commentary on attacks of President Motlante's private life, appeared in independently run newspapers, and media, recently. Motlante recently refused ANC pressure, to change the board of the SABC, South Africa's government media network, without fair proceedings, even as they had been reportedly pulled into ANC headquarters, and encouraged to give the ANC better coverage. The ANC, has consistently interfered with the running of state television and radio. Local newspapers, years ago: alleged that the state broadcaster was no longer independent. SABC board members, were due to get the sack from communist affiliated Zuma's ANC recently, but Motlante stood against this, and refused to sign that. Motlante: however: has disbanded the "Scorpions", the body, which was investigating Zuma for corruption.

Response of the Office of Helen Zille (DA Leader) on concerns over homosexuality statements

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:39:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters guide)

Introduction by Marc Aupiais

The following is an Email Response, by the office of Helen Zille, leader of the DA (Democratic Alliance) in South Africa, and Mayor of Cape Town, to concerns raised, over a press release, in which the ANC were lambasted, for not supporting a document, which in addition to the noble cause of decriminalizing Homosexuality, legally: also promoted, and seemed to attempt to legislate "Gender theory": which would insinuate support of Homosexual civil unions: "Gay Marriage", something the church considers to be irreconcilable with Catholic morality, and society.

Date: 19 January 2009 16:06
Email: Leader < leader@da.org.za >
Title: Response from the office of Helen Zille
Respondent: Tammy Evans

Large sections of the Contents of Email Response:

"Dear Mr Aupiais

On behalf of Helen Zille, thank you for your e-mail.

As indicated in the press statement you refer to, the DA supports the decriminalisation of homosexuality in line with our Constitution.

The DA’s position on civil unions is the same as it always has been. Like all issues of conscience, the DA gives its members a free vote to vote in Parliament as they choose.

Giving our members a free vote on civil unions is compatible with the belief that homosexuality is not a crime.

I hope that this e-mail has served to clarify your concerns.

Please feel free to remain in touch with our office.

Sincerely

Tammy Evans

Political Assistant

Office of the Leader - Democratic Alliance

2nd floor, Marks Building, Parliament

Cape Town 8000"

This email (contact details somewhat excluded)

is in response to another by ourselves: to the DA:

"A DA objection, to not voting on a UN proposal by France has caught my attention. My objection, is not the protection of homosexual rights, but the same, as that given by the Vatican, when apposing such a proposal. The proposal promotes Gender theory, and therefore gay marriage. Yes, South Africa should have stated, they supported the principle of freedom from persecution, but support of that proposal means indirectly, seeming: support for Gay marriage (something that the SA populace does not in majority support): an issue that he DA has been neutral on previously. I would like a clarification from the DA: on their neutrality on this issue, as it will affect both my vote, and many others. This does affect moral issues, as the DA is in fact, willingly or not: making a stance on this issue!"
(to: leader@da.org.za;
date: 16 January 2009 15:39;
subject: Clarification needed, I represent a media initiative (3 days ago);
mailed-by gmail.com)

South Africa: ANC President: only Afrikaaners: true african tribe, out of whites

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:01:00 +0000

(Scripturelink Voters Guide; c.f. IOL (Secular; South African; Independent) 12 / Jan / 2009)

Article by Marc Aupiais

While the FF+'s ("Freedom Front Plus") leader Pieter Mulder: called statements, amounting to calling non-Afrikaner whites foreigners: clear political leadership, from ANC ("African National Congress") president, and leader: Jacob Zuma, whose followers have been accused of violence and intimidation, of average citizens, and even judges, and political leaders, many other voices, have seemed to remain silent.

Jacob Zuma, insinuated that having more than one passport, made a South African, not an African, and likened himself to an Afrikaner, saying they "are the only "white tribe" "on the continent" which belongs to Africa "Completely"".

Apartheid, was maintained under the Calvinistic, protestant, Afrikaans: Nationalist Party government, in which those not speaking Afrikaans were second class citizens, including English speaking people of European Descent. Those of different races: had different jobs available, and there was unequal treatment of peoples. Zuma supporters, stoned a woman, who looked like the one, now in exile, with the ANC saying her safety is not guaranteed, until she revokes accusations of rape against Zuma. He also, has tried every trick to escape being tried on corruption, in which his financial advisor, tried before him: was found guilty of a "Generally Corrupt" relationship with him.

Israel keeps her word: unilateral ceasefire, which Hamas has vowed to ignore

noreply@blogger.com (scripturelink) — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 06:13:00 +0000

(Social Justice South Africa; Scripturelink Voters Guide; c.f. (thanks to a dear friend) CBSNEWS (Secular; Independent; American) 17 / Jan / 2009; c.f. BBC World News (Reliable; Secular; British; Government) 18 / Jan 2009; Archive 15 / Jan / 2009)

Article by Marc Aupiais

Israel said it was all about missiles, and considering the more cautious governance, of the ruling political forces, this seemed believable, and appears to be the case. Israel, has declared it would, and seems to have: unilaterally withdrawn offenses on the Gaza Strip, it plans to retain troops for ten more days, however, it will not launch fresh offenses, even as it has vowed that troops will defend themselves if and when Hamas believes it can attack. Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement), which the BBC suspects, could be funded by Iran, along with fellow terrorists: Hezbolla in their suspected funders: has itself, as Hamas, vowed to continue fighting, even as Israel has stopped offenses, resulting in a quite night, after about three weeks of fighting.

Israeli troops, remain, so that they and Egypt, can arrange security, to prevent Hamas from smuggling in weapons, to restart offenses. After the Unilateral Ceasefire, Hamas, which still has the destruction of Israel, which they do not recognize as a state: as their goal: still wanted bloodshed. At least one missile was launched against Israel after the truce went into effect, according to CBS, quoting a source called "Bergers".

1200 Palestinians have died in this conflict, as well as at least ten Israelis. What a child and woman is in this conflict is hard to determine. Being under the age of 18 makes one a child: but in Islamist conflicts, women have been suicide bombers, and perhaps could be militants, and children have become militants.

Facilities, and resources of many humanitarian, or relief groups, have been casualty to air-strikes in this conflict, and the UN is worried about the state of hospitals. Israel was accused of disproportionate force in protecting her borders, but countered that their civilians were being hit.

A probable reason for Israeli speed, and proportions; is that the Bush administration is set to leave soon: even with a proportionate response, it is much less likely, that Israel would get away with defending their borders under the Democrat Obama, who in this issue, said, via advisors: he would not cause two authorities, but who has spoken up on almost everything else. It seemed an odd statement to make. Barak Hussein Obama: voted to euthanise abortion survivors, and wants to get rid of parental consent for abortion. He has not, during the fighting: commented on the deathly situation in the Gaza Strip.

This entire conflict, could probably, have been done, and likely would have been done in a smaller, more civilized manner: if Israel knew it could rely on international support, as it protected its borders. Humanitarian casualties, and the entire situation, would probably have been low key in such a situation, whereby those currently in power in Israel, had previously been extremely soft, even to the point of endangering their political future: on the Gaza Strip situation. They only launched offenses: after a period of daily attacks on civilians.

This is not to justify the offensive; it is however to state what appears to be fact: Israel thought this proportion of force was utterly necessary. Considering stances of those in power in Israel, previous stances before this conflict: should they have believed there was an easier, less collateral spewed manner to protect Israel, they likely would have taken it. Before the counterstrike was launched, Israel, had already given up hope of international solutions. Also, efforts by the international community, as we, and any astute analyst would have predicted, and as we did predict: were not the ones to end this conflict: as we predicted, it was ended purely at the whims of Israel, as would be obvious.

As long as the world shows such blatant bias in judging conflicts, rather than realizing the root cause of these, and realizing who started what: civilian casualties will remain high in situations such as this one. If no-one else will look after Israel, Israel will: the problem is, the manner in which they now can: in that a smaller attack would have had as much backlash, and no attack, would mean allowing terrorism against their innocent civilians.

Blame for collateral damage: must be placed equally on Israel, and on Hamas: and on every biased voice which misrepresented this conflict. Refusal to reason by Hamas, and outright provocation, cannot be ignored. The Hague should be consulted on this issue. From all appearances, it appears as though the Israeli hand seemed almost forced: forced by fear of reprisals when Bush left, and by political pressure, by their own women and children, and rabbits, and dogs, and boys and men: and even an infant: by those facing daily terror attacks: in a war between hateful extremists, and civilians: in which a military chose to intervene.

Before the world says "Never Again", and then forgets they have: one must look at the core of the issue: the reason this tragedy has occurred: lies squarely on the arms of the international community: on the international hatred and bias: so evident (Archive 15 / Jan / 2009) in France recently: which had, when this situation was minor: completely ignored the plight of Israel: so that Israel did, as they always had: and put on a display, which cost, in this case, in a way: 1200 or more or less lives.

from	DA News
to		"sanlameer@gmail.com"
date		12 February 2009 18:10
subject		DA MANIFESTO LAUNCH LIVE ON TV